Skip to main content

The Federal Trade Commission’s much-anticipated final rule prohibiting all non-compete agreements for all employees at all levels, with only extremely limited exceptions, arrived in April — 15 months and 26,000+ public comments after being first proposed. With legal challenges already underway, the implications of, as well as exceptions to, this final rule are a classic “hope for the best, prepare for the worst” scenario.

State limitations on non-competes

The FTC rule would preempt state laws only where there is a conflict.

  • Outright bans.
  • Income or other compensation-based thresholds.
  • Not allowed for certain medical professionals.

Pending challenges

  • Lawsuits challenging the rule are pending in the U.S. district courts for the Northern District of Texas and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
  • The impact of these lawsuits is limited in scope, but the suits have set the stage for a possible nationwide injunction.

Key employer takeaways

Don’t panic!

  • The FTC’s final rule is not yet effective and the legal challenges to it are significant.

Hope for the best and prepare for the worst

  • Do your senior executives meet the definition for an exception from the ban?
  • Do your agreements “function” to prevent or penalize a worker from taking another job?
  • Who will need to receive notice?

As always . . . 

  • Draft narrowly to protect legitimate business interests, such as trade secrets, confidential information or customer goodwill.
  • Draft for severability.
  • Avoid non-competes for lower-level workers absent legitimate reasons to do so.
home icon in white
Mid-Year 2024: Now + Next